GBBYF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.03 (+42.86%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
KENS
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

GBBYF vs KENS

Header iconGBBYF vs KENS Comparison
Open Charts GBBYF vs KENSBanner chart's image
Goodbaby International Holdings
Price$0.10
Change+$0.03 (+42.86%)
Volume$250
CapitalizationN/A
Kenilworth Systems
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$972
CapitalizationN/A
GBBYF vs KENS Comparison Chart
Loading...
GBBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KENS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBBYF vs. KENS commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBBYF is a Hold and KENS is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GBBYF: $0.10 vs. KENS: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: GBBYF and KENS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBBYF: 53% vs. KENS: 106%
Market capitalization -- GBBYF: $121.94M vs. KENS: $2.62M
GBBYF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $121.94M. KENS’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $2.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBBYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKENS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GBBYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KENS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GBBYF and KENS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBBYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KENS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBBYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • KENS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KENS is a better buy in the short-term than GBBYF.

Price Growth

GBBYF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KENS (@Recreational Products) price change was +7.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -4.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

KENS is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-4.11% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBBYF($122M) has a higher market cap than KENS($2.62M). KENS has higher P/E ratio than GBBYF: KENS (588.24) vs GBBYF (102.04). KENS YTD gains are higher at: 350.000 vs. GBBYF (122.889). GBBYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 703M vs. KENS (-23.85K). GBBYF has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. KENS (702). KENS has less debt than GBBYF: KENS (7.5K) vs GBBYF (3.82B). GBBYF has higher revenues than KENS: GBBYF (9.69B) vs KENS (0).
GBBYFKENSGBBYF / KENS
Capitalization122M2.62M4,649%
EBITDA703M-23.85K-2,947,466%
Gain YTD122.889350.00035%
P/E Ratio102.04588.2417%
Revenue9.69B0-
Total Cash1.11B702157,407,407%
Total Debt3.82B7.5K50,906,667%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBBYF vs KENS: Fundamental Ratings
GBBYF
KENS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2828
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
8695
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9291
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBBYF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KENS (100). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KENS’s over the last 12 months.

KENS's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBBYF (100). This means that KENS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBYF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as KENS (95). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to KENS’s over the last 12 months.

KENS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBYF (38). This means that KENS’s stock grew similarly to GBBYF’s over the last 12 months.

KENS's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBYF (92). This means that KENS’s stock grew similarly to GBBYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBBYFKENS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GBBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KENS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRNS0.24N/A
-1.38%
Marinus Pharmaceuticals
VTR58.70-1.52
-2.52%
Ventas
JYNT10.64-0.33
-3.01%
Joint Corp (The)
MRVI5.58-0.22
-3.88%
Maravai LifeSciences Holdings
AI39.69-3.17
-7.40%
C3ai

GBBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBBYF and THLPF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBBYF and THLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBBYF
1D Price
Change %
GBBYF100%
N/A
THLPF - GBBYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOMYY - GBBYF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - GBBYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLKXF - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GYYMF - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KENS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KENS and CLKXF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KENS and CLKXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KENS
1D Price
Change %
KENS100%
N/A
CLKXF - KENS
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBYF - KENS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - KENS
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOCIF - KENS
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMWKF - KENS
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
More