Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMEBX
GBCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.51
Change+$0.08 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.56M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.37B
GBCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. GBCAX (19.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMEBX (1.12) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. GBCAX (1.34). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. GBCAX (27.95).
| GBCAX | RMEBX | GBCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.07 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 1.07 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.312 | 9.495 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.12 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.34 | 11.31 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.87 | 28.70 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.95 | 60.65 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.91 | 77.57 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement