Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMEBX
GBCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.38
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.44M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
GBCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBCAX (19.4M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMEBX (1.11) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. GBCAX (0.90). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. GBCAX (19.50).
| GBCAX | RMEBX | GBCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.07 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 1.07 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.015 | 10.612 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.11 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.90 | 7.63 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.95 | 22.19 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.50 | 53.85 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.85 | 77.43 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement