Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMEBX
GBCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.89
Change+$0.09 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.95M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.07B
GBCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBCAX (19.9M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMEBX (1.12) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. GBCAX (2.92). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. GBCAX (27.52).
| GBCAX | RMEBX | GBCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.07 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 1.07 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.507 | 11.253 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.12 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 11.26 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.58 | 30.31 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.52 | 59.35 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.49 | 80.17 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement