Ad is loading...
GBCAX vs RMEBX
GBCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$15.46
Change-$0.09 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.77M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$51.02
Change-$0.39 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.86B
GBCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 93.9B vs. GBCAX (16.8M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMEBX (1.18) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCAX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCAX (2.70) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (19.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.34 vs. GBCAX (-14.26). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.86 vs. GBCAX (20.28).
| GBCAX | RMEBX | GBCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.07 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.70 | 1.07 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.770 | -6.815 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8M | 93.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.18 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.26 | -3.34 | 427% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.81 | -0.08 | 16,951% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.28 | 47.86 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.12 | 46.45 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...