Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.99
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.7M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.09
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GBCAX (19.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.20) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.91 vs. GBCAX (2.06). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.49 vs. GBCAX (28.38).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.91 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.633 | 14.761 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.20 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 7.91 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.46 | 38.55 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.38 | 63.49 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.78 | 97.36 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement