Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.51
Change+$0.08 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.56M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.37B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. GBCAX (19.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.27) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. GBCAX (1.34). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. GBCAX (27.95).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.91 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.312 | 9.596 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.27 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.34 | 11.47 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.87 | 29.27 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.95 | 61.83 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.91 | 79.21 | -1% |