Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$17.43
Change+$0.16 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.64M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GBCAX (18.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.31) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. GBCAX (-4.62). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. GBCAX (13.61).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.91 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.432 | 5.919 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.31 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.62 | 9.01 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.25 | 17.82 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.61 | 51.66 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.16 | 70.47 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement