Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.89
Change+$0.09 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.95M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.07B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBCAX (19.9M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.27) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. GBCAX (2.92). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.49 vs. GBCAX (27.52).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.91 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.507 | 11.347 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.27 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 11.38 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.58 | 30.87 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.52 | 60.49 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.49 | 81.82 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement