Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.58
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.85M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBCAX (19.8M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.21) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. GBCAX (-4.45). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. GBCAX (13.79).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.91 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.261 | 12.783 | 80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.21 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.45 | 6.00 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.07 | 27.94 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.79 | 52.67 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.12 | 84.73 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers