Ad is loading...
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$15.46
Change-$0.09 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.77M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$50.74
Change-$0.38 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.86B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 93.9B vs. GBCAX (16.8M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.34) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCAX (2.70) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (19.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.21 vs. GBCAX (-14.26). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.93 vs. GBCAX (20.28).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.91 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.70 | 0.91 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.770 | -6.760 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8M | 93.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.34 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.26 | -3.21 | 445% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.81 | 0.36 | -3,570% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.28 | 48.93 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.12 | 47.77 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...