Ad is loading...
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$17.31
Change+$0.11 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.48M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. GBCAX (18.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.69) vs GBCAX (0.17). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. GBCAX (19.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. GBCAX (2.50). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. GBCAX (2.82).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.669 | 2.162 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.5M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.69 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.50 | 12.43 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.33 | 12.60 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.82 | 37.82 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.13 | 65.18 | -5% |