Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.38
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.44M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.07
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBCAX (19.4M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.26) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. GBCAX (0.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.95 vs. GBCAX (19.50).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.91 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.015 | 10.721 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.26 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.90 | 7.77 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.95 | 22.69 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.50 | 54.95 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.85 | 79.02 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement