Ad is loading...
GBCAX vs RMFCX
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$17.52
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.86M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.23
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
GBCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GBCAX (18.9M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFCX (1.69) vs GBCAX (0.17). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. GBCAX (19.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.03 vs. GBCAX (0.02). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. GBCAX (6.39).
| GBCAX | RMFCX | GBCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.915 | 4.836 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.9M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.69 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 11.03 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.18 | 19.69 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.39 | 41.75 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.60 | 64.83 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...