Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFEX
GBCAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.38
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.44M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.46
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
GBCAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBCAX (19.4M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFEX (1.51) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. GBCAX (0.90). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. GBCAX (19.50).
| GBCAX | RMFEX | GBCAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.62 | 427% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.015 | 10.922 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.51 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.90 | 8.10 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.95 | 23.84 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.50 | 57.34 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.85 | 86.04 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement