Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFEX
GBCAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.99
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.7M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.48
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
GBCAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GBCAX (19.7M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFEX (1.46) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.26 vs. GBCAX (2.06). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.04 vs. GBCAX (28.38).
| GBCAX | RMFEX | GBCAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.62 | 427% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.633 | 15.028 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.46 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 8.26 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.46 | 39.84 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.38 | 66.04 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.78 | 105.33 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement