Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCAX vs RMFEX
GBCAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCAX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
Price$18.58
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.85M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.42
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
GBCAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBCAX (19.8M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCAX: RMFEX (1.46) vs GBCAX (0.07). GBCAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCAX (22 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCAX (2.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCAX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCAX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCAX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. GBCAX (-4.45). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. GBCAX (13.79).
| GBCAX | RMFEX | GBCAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.65 | 0.62 | 427% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.261 | 13.076 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.46 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.45 | 6.34 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.07 | 29.13 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.79 | 55.02 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.12 | 92.11 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement