Ad is loading...
GBCCX vs RMFCX
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$13.56
Change+$0.23 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.24M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. GBCCX (17.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFCX (1.34) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCCX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCCX (3.45) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (19.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. GBCCX (-12.93). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. GBCCX (12.58).
| GBCCX | RMFCX | GBCCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.76 | 0.91 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.45 | 0.91 | 379% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.653 | -2.681 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.2M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.93 | 1.87 | -690% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.53 | 6.27 | -200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | 53.32 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.60 | 54.78 | -49% |