Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFCX
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$14.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.57M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.12
Change+$0.21 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.55B
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GBCCX (18.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFCX (1.31) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCCX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. GBCCX (-5.84). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.43 vs. GBCCX (10.17).
| GBCCX | RMFCX | GBCCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.91 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.91 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | 4.964 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.84 | 8.31 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.34 | 18.02 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | 53.43 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.67 | 68.15 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement