Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFCX
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$15.25
Change+$0.14 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.92M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.70
Change+$0.74 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.77B
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. GBCCX (18.9M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFCX (1.26) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. GBCCX (-0.85). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.49 vs. GBCCX (12.76).
| GBCCX | RMFCX | GBCCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.91 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.91 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.812 | 10.039 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.9M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | 9.53 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.41 | 26.33 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.76 | 56.49 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.61 | 79.59 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement