Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFCX
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$15.60
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.6M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.38
Change-$0.21 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.87B
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GBCCX (19.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFCX (1.27) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.78 vs. GBCCX (-0.51). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.49 vs. GBCCX (21.02).
| GBCCX | RMFCX | GBCCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.91 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.91 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.244 | 9.449 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.27 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.51 | 9.78 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.73 | 31.02 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.02 | 61.49 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.29 | 76.01 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement