Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFCX
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$15.96
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.62M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
GBCCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GBCCX (19.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFCX (1.20) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. GBCCX (0.57). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.89 vs. GBCCX (17.38).
| GBCCX | RMFCX | GBCCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.91 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.91 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.625 | 14.983 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.57 | 7.84 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.12 | 43.87 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.38 | 58.89 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.21 | 94.24 | -4% |