Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCIX vs RMFCX
GBCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$17.43
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.64M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
GBCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GBCIX (18.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMFCX (1.31) vs GBCIX (0.60). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCIX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. GBCIX (-3.44). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.95 vs. GBCIX (19.61).
| GBCIX | RMFCX | GBCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.91 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.070 | 5.423 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.31 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 8.44 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.28 | 18.47 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.61 | 50.95 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.31 | 69.73 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers