Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCIX vs RMFCX
GBCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$18.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.85M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
GBCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBCIX (19.8M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMFCX (1.21) vs GBCIX (0.54). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCIX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. GBCIX (-3.59). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. GBCIX (19.58).
| GBCIX | RMFCX | GBCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.91 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.275 | 12.783 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.21 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.59 | 6.00 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.33 | 27.94 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.58 | 52.67 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.22 | 84.73 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement