Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCIX vs RMFCX
GBCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$19.05
Change-$0.14 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.63M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.88
Change-$0.33 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.58B
GBCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GBCIX (19.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMFCX (1.20) vs GBCIX (0.55). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCIX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. GBCIX (1.77). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.04 vs. GBCIX (30.70).
| GBCIX | RMFCX | GBCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.91 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.282 | 14.373 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.20 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | 6.61 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.04 | 43.70 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.70 | 58.04 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.60 | 93.10 | 21% |