Ad is loading...
GBCIX vs RMFCX
GBCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMFCX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$16.74
Change+$0.28 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.21M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.74
Change+$0.73 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
GBCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. GBCIX (18.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMFCX (1.34) vs GBCIX (0.60). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GBCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GBCIX (2.45) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (19.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMFCX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. GBCIX (-8.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.30 vs. GBCIX (31.57).
| GBCIX | RMFCX | GBCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.45 | 0.91 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.834 | -1.247 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2M | 97.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.34 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.11 | 3.87 | -210% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.29 | 9.64 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.57 | 54.30 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.26 | 55.97 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...