Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCIX vs RMFEX
GBCIX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$18.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.85M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.42
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
GBCIX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBCIX (19.8M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMFEX (1.46) vs GBCIX (0.54). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCIX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCIX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. GBCIX (-3.59). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. GBCIX (19.58).
| GBCIX | RMFEX | GBCIX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.62 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.275 | 13.076 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.46 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.59 | 6.34 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.33 | 29.13 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.58 | 55.02 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.22 | 92.11 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement