Ad is loading...
GBCIX vs RMFEX
GBCIX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$15.67
Change-$0.88 (-5.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.77M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$51.43
Change-$3.04 (-5.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.86B
GBCIX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 93.9B vs. GBCIX (16.8M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMFEX (1.61) vs GBCIX (0.60). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCIX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCIX (2.45) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (19.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.34 vs. GBCIX (-12.91). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.42 vs. GBCIX (40.61).
| GBCIX | RMFEX | GBCIX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.62 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.45 | 0.62 | 395% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.497 | -5.993 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8M | 93.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.61 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.91 | -1.34 | 966% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.27 | 3.22 | -319% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.61 | 63.42 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.27 | 56.19 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...