Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCIX vs RMFEX
GBCIX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$17.43
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.64M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.70
Change-$0.05 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
GBCIX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GBCIX (18.6M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMFEX (1.58) vs GBCIX (0.60). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCIX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCIX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. GBCIX (-3.44). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 53.30 vs. GBCIX (19.61).
| GBCIX | RMFEX | GBCIX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.62 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.070 | 5.559 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.58 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 8.80 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.28 | 19.58 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.61 | 53.30 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.31 | 76.28 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers