Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBFAX vs RNWBX
GBFAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GBFAX vs RNWBX
VanEck Emerging Markets A
Price$16.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.26M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.39
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
GBFAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBFAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBFAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. GBFAX (325M). GBFAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GBFAX (0.71) vs RNWBX (0.12). GBFAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GBFAX (32 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) and GBFAX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GBFAX (19.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBFAX: RNWBX (250) vs GBFAX (1000). GBFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.19 vs. RNWBX (17.87). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.89 vs. GBFAX (-11.32).
| GBFAX | RNWBX | GBFAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.379 | 22.896 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.12 | 601% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.19 | 17.87 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.10 | 43.03 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.32 | 15.89 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.45 | 82.21 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers