Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBFAX vs RNWBX
GBFAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GBFAX vs RNWBX
VanEck Emerging Markets A
Price$15.73
Change+$0.05 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets334.24M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
GBFAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBFAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBFAX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. GBFAX (334M). GBFAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GBFAX (0.81) vs RNWBX (0.13). GBFAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GBFAX (32 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) and GBFAX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GBFAX (19.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBFAX: RNWBX (250) vs GBFAX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. GBFAX (10.44). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. GBFAX (-6.06).
| GBFAX | RNWBX | GBFAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.896 | 17.729 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 334M | 71.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.13 | 625% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | 12.87 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.60 | 30.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.06 | 22.93 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.56 | 72.17 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement