Ad is loading...
GBFAX vs RNWHX
GBFAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GBFAX vs RNWHX
VanEck Emerging Markets A
Price$13.06
Change+$0.19 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.04M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$74.96
Change+$0.47 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.57B
GBFAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBFAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBFAX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 59.6B vs. GBFAX (347M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GBFAX: RNWHX (1.12) vs GBFAX (0.91). GBFAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GBFAX (31 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). GBFAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GBFAX (11.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBFAX: RNWHX (250) vs GBFAX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.63 vs. GBFAX (-2.61). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.89 vs. GBFAX (-2.84).
| GBFAX | RNWHX | GBFAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.285 | -1.394 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 59.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.12 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.61 | 0.63 | -412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.00 | 4.75 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.84 | 32.89 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers