Ad is loading...
GBLBF
Price
$68.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
IOOFF
Price
$1.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

GBLBF vs IOOFF

Header iconGBLBF vs IOOFF Comparison
Open Charts GBLBF vs IOOFFBanner chart's image
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$68.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$19.08K
CapitalizationN/A
Insignia Financial
Price$1.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$915
CapitalizationN/A
GBLBF vs IOOFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBLBF vs. IOOFF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBLBF is a Hold and IOOFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GBLBF: $68.21 vs. IOOFF: $1.30)
Brand notoriety: GBLBF and IOOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBLBF: 72% vs. IOOFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GBLBF: $11.08B vs. IOOFF: $1.32B
GBLBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $11.08B. IOOFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBLBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIOOFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GBLBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IOOFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBLBF is a better buy in the long-term than IOOFF.

Price Growth

GBLBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.89% price change this week, while IOOFF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.35% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBLBF($11.1B) has a higher market cap than IOOFF($1.32B). IOOFF has higher P/E ratio than GBLBF: IOOFF (64.94) vs GBLBF (47.39). GBLBF YTD gains are higher at: -13.658 vs. IOOFF (-21.687). GBLBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 676M vs. IOOFF (126M). GBLBF has more cash in the bank: 3.3B vs. IOOFF (1.3B). IOOFF has less debt than GBLBF: IOOFF (572M) vs GBLBF (7.81B). GBLBF has higher revenues than IOOFF: GBLBF (9B) vs IOOFF (1.96B).
GBLBFIOOFFGBLBF / IOOFF
Capitalization11.1B1.32B843%
EBITDA676M126M537%
Gain YTD-13.658-21.68763%
P/E Ratio47.3964.9473%
Revenue9B1.96B459%
Total Cash3.3B1.3B254%
Total Debt7.81B572M1,365%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBLBF vs IOOFF: Fundamental Ratings
GBLBF
IOOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6588
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7671
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
279
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IOOFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as GBLBF (18). This means that IOOFF’s stock grew similarly to GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

IOOFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GBLBF (100). This means that IOOFF’s stock grew similarly to GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as IOOFF (88). This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to IOOFF’s over the last 12 months.

IOOFF's Price Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as GBLBF (76). This means that IOOFF’s stock grew similarly to GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IOOFF (79). This means that GBLBF’s stock grew significantly faster than IOOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMKBX20.97-0.13
-0.62%
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts A
ESCGX10.31-0.07
-0.67%
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG C
TNVIX18.38-0.18
-0.96%
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value I
FOSKX63.84-0.81
-1.25%
Fidelity Overseas K
PSMKX54.41-0.97
-1.75%
Pioneer Select Mid Cap Growth K

GBLBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBF and VRTS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBF and VRTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBF
1D Price
Change %
GBLBF100%
N/A
VRTS - GBLBF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
JHG - GBLBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
AMP - GBLBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
BBUC - GBLBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
BN - GBLBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
More

IOOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOOFF has been loosely correlated with TRRPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IOOFF jumps, then TRRPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IOOFF
1D Price
Change %
IOOFF100%
N/A
TRRPF - IOOFF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GBLBF - IOOFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCMG - IOOFF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
WNDLF - IOOFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFHHF - IOOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More