GBLBY
Price
$8.57
Change
-$0.43 (-4.78%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.8B
GCAAF
Price
$48.07
Change
-$0.17 (-0.35%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GBLBY vs GCAAF

Header iconGBLBY vs GCAAF Comparison
Open Charts GBLBY vs GCAAFBanner chart's image
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$8.57
Change-$0.43 (-4.78%)
Volume$989
Capitalization10.8B
Guardian Capital Group
Price$48.07
Change-$0.17 (-0.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.18B
GBLBY vs GCAAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GBLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBLBY vs. GCAAF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBLBY is a Hold and GCAAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GBLBY: $8.57 vs. GCAAF: $48.07)
Brand notoriety: GBLBY and GCAAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBLBY: 37% vs. GCAAF: 2%
Market capitalization -- GBLBY: $10.8B vs. GCAAF: $1.18B
GBLBY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $10.8B. GCAAF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBLBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGCAAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GBLBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GCAAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCAAF is a better buy in the long-term than GBLBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBLBY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCAAF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBLBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GCAAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCAAF is a better buy in the short-term than GBLBY.

Price Growth

GBLBY (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.05% price change this week, while GCAAF (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBLBY($10.8B) has a higher market cap than GCAAF($1.18B). GBLBY has higher P/E ratio than GCAAF: GBLBY (307.91) vs GCAAF (10.77). GCAAF YTD gains are higher at: 70.039 vs. GBLBY (34.928). GBLBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 786M vs. GCAAF (200M). GBLBY has more cash in the bank: 3.37B vs. GCAAF (170M). GCAAF has less debt than GBLBY: GCAAF (179M) vs GBLBY (7.39B). GBLBY has higher revenues than GCAAF: GBLBY (6.09B) vs GCAAF (398M).
GBLBYGCAAFGBLBY / GCAAF
Capitalization10.8B1.18B913%
EBITDA786M200M393%
Gain YTD34.92870.03950%
P/E Ratio307.9110.772,860%
Revenue6.09B398M1,530%
Total Cash3.37B170M1,985%
Total Debt7.39B179M4,126%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBLBY vs GCAAF: Fundamental Ratings
GBLBY
GCAAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9697
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7026
SMR RATING
1..100
9263
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBLBY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (23). This means that GBLBY’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBLBY (70). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBLBY’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as GBLBY (92). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to GBLBY’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GBLBY (51). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to GBLBY’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCAAF (85). This means that GBLBY’s stock grew significantly faster than GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBLBYGCAAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
6%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GBLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEMGX42.15N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity R3
GSTSX11.57N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Svc
RYMSX24.92N/A
N/A
Guggenheim Multi-Hedge Strategies P
NOSGX14.05N/A
N/A
Northern Small Cap Value
IBARX25.97N/A
N/A
Macquarie Balanced Fund Class R6

GBLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBY and GMHLF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBY and GMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBY
1D Price
Change %
GBLBY100%
N/A
GMHLF - GBLBY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCGI - GBLBY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRMO - GBLBY
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
GCAAF - GBLBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRRPF - GBLBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GCAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCAAF and AGFMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCAAF and AGFMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCAAF
1D Price
Change %
GCAAF100%
N/A
AGFMF - GCAAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAIN - GCAAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
HTGC - GCAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
GBLBY - GCAAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GCAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More