GBLBY
Price
$8.88
Change
+$0.38 (+4.47%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.74B
GCAAF
Price
$48.22
Change
+$0.02 (+0.04%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GBLBY vs GCAAF

Header iconGBLBY vs GCAAF Comparison
Open Charts GBLBY vs GCAAFBanner chart's image
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$8.88
Change+$0.38 (+4.47%)
Volume$5.78K
Capitalization10.74B
Guardian Capital Group
Price$48.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization1.19B
GBLBY vs GCAAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GBLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBLBY vs. GCAAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBLBY is a Buy and GCAAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GBLBY: $8.89 vs. GCAAF: $48.22)
Brand notoriety: GBLBY and GCAAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBLBY: 220% vs. GCAAF: 300%
Market capitalization -- GBLBY: $10.74B vs. GCAAF: $1.19B
GBLBY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $10.74B. GCAAF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBLBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGCAAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GBLBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GCAAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GBLBY and GCAAF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBLBY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCAAF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBLBY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • GCAAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GBLBY is a better buy in the short-term than GCAAF.

Price Growth

GBLBY (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GCAAF (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBLBY($10.7B) has a higher market cap than GCAAF($1.19B). GBLBY has higher P/E ratio than GCAAF: GBLBY (307.91) vs GCAAF (10.76). GCAAF YTD gains are higher at: 70.570 vs. GBLBY (39.887). GBLBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 786M vs. GCAAF (200M). GBLBY has more cash in the bank: 3.37B vs. GCAAF (170M). GCAAF has less debt than GBLBY: GCAAF (179M) vs GBLBY (7.39B). GBLBY has higher revenues than GCAAF: GBLBY (6.09B) vs GCAAF (398M).
GBLBYGCAAFGBLBY / GCAAF
Capitalization10.7B1.19B898%
EBITDA786M200M393%
Gain YTD39.88770.57057%
P/E Ratio307.9110.762,861%
Revenue6.09B398M1,530%
Total Cash3.37B170M1,985%
Total Debt7.39B179M4,126%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBLBY vs GCAAF: Fundamental Ratings
GBLBY
GCAAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3987
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6323
SMR RATING
1..100
9163
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
189
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBLBY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (23). This means that GBLBY’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBLBY (63). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBLBY’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as GBLBY (91). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to GBLBY’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GBLBY (48). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to GBLBY’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCAAF (89). This means that GBLBY’s stock grew significantly faster than GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBLBYGCAAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
6%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GBLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIVIX15.23N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Large Cap Value Inst
MRIGX34.17N/A
N/A
Meridian Growth Investor
FNPIX47.68N/A
N/A
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Inv
VRTPX22.00N/A
N/A
Vanguard Real Estate II Index
FSSJX13.58N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Select Intl Sm Cp

GBLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBY and GMHLF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBY and GMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBY
1D Price
Change %
GBLBY100%
N/A
GMHLF - GBLBY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCGI - GBLBY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRMO - GBLBY
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.82%
GCAAF - GBLBY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
FRRPF - GBLBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GCAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCAAF and AGFMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCAAF and AGFMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCAAF
1D Price
Change %
GCAAF100%
+0.04%
AGFMF - GCAAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
MAIN - GCAAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
HTGC - GCAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
GBLBY - GCAAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GCAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
More