GBOOF
Price
$7.20
Change
+$0.03 (+0.42%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
27.44B
PTBS
Price
$15.93
Change
+$0.23 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
40.14M
Ad is loading...

GBOOF vs PTBS

Header iconGBOOF vs PTBS Comparison
Open Charts GBOOF vs PTBSBanner chart's image
Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. De C.V
Price$7.20
Change+$0.03 (+0.42%)
Volume$1.79K
Capitalization27.44B
Potomac Bancshares
Price$15.93
Change+$0.23 (+1.46%)
Volume$608
Capitalization40.14M
GBOOF vs PTBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
GBOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PTBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBOOF vs. PTBS commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBOOF is a Hold and PTBS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GBOOF: $7.20 vs. PTBS: $15.93)
Brand notoriety: GBOOF and PTBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBOOF: 8% vs. PTBS: 25%
Market capitalization -- GBOOF: $27.44B vs. PTBS: $40.14M
GBOOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $27.44B. PTBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $40.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBOOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePTBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GBOOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PTBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PTBS is a better buy in the long-term than GBOOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBOOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PTBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBOOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PTBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PTBS is a better buy in the short-term than GBOOF.

Price Growth

GBOOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.51% price change this week, while PTBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

PTBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBOOF($27.4B) has a higher market cap than PTBS($40.1M). GBOOF YTD gains are higher at: 7.063 vs. PTBS (-6.294). PTBS has less debt than GBOOF: PTBS (1.22M) vs GBOOF (130B). GBOOF has higher revenues than PTBS: GBOOF (186B) vs PTBS (14.3M).
GBOOFPTBSGBOOF / PTBS
Capitalization27.4B40.1M68,329%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.063-6.294-112%
P/E Ratio9.45N/A-
Revenue186B14.3M1,300,699%
Total CashN/A1.57M-
Total Debt130B1.22M10,647,011%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBOOF vs PTBS: Fundamental Ratings
GBOOF
PTBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6843
SMR RATING
1..100
151
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8342
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PTBS's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBOOF (84). This means that PTBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBOOF’s over the last 12 months.

PTBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GBOOF (68). This means that PTBS’s stock grew similarly to GBOOF’s over the last 12 months.

GBOOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PTBS (51). This means that GBOOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PTBS’s over the last 12 months.

PTBS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GBOOF (59). This means that PTBS’s stock grew similarly to GBOOF’s over the last 12 months.

PTBS's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBOOF (83). This means that PTBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBOOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBOOFPTBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GBOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PTBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEHP24.980.25
+0.99%
Dimensional Em Mkts High Prof ETF
VLUE109.700.95
+0.87%
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
BLCV32.580.19
+0.59%
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
VCEB62.010.02
+0.03%
Vanguard ESG US Corporate Bond ETF
BRLN52.52-0.01
-0.01%
iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF

GBOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBOOF and ONB have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBOOF and ONB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBOOF
1D Price
Change %
GBOOF100%
+0.38%
ONB - GBOOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
KEY - GBOOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.58%
HMST - GBOOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
RAIFY - GBOOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.85%
BSAC - GBOOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More

PTBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PTBS and NRIM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTBS and NRIM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTBS
1D Price
Change %
PTBS100%
N/A
NRIM - PTBS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
TSBK - PTBS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
EFSC - PTBS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
GBOOF - PTBS
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
WCFB - PTBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More