GCAAF
Price
$48.22
Change
+$0.02 (+0.04%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
HALFF
Price
$165.38
Change
+$1.88 (+1.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCAAF vs HALFF

Header iconGCAAF vs HALFF Comparison
Open Charts GCAAF vs HALFFBanner chart's image
Guardian Capital Group
Price$48.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization1.19B
Hal Trust
Price$165.38
Change+$1.88 (+1.15%)
Volume$1
Capitalization14.96B
GCAAF vs HALFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GCAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HALFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCAAF vs. HALFF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCAAF is a StrongBuy and HALFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GCAAF: $48.22 vs. HALFF: $165.38)
Brand notoriety: GCAAF and HALFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCAAF: 300% vs. HALFF: 0%
Market capitalization -- GCAAF: $1.19B vs. HALFF: $14.96B
GCAAF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.19B. HALFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $14.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCAAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHALFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GCAAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HALFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCAAF is a better buy in the long-term than HALFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCAAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HALFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCAAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HALFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCAAF is a better buy in the short-term than HALFF.

Price Growth

GCAAF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.84% price change this week, while HALFF (@Investment Managers) price change was +11.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HALFF($15B) has a higher market cap than GCAAF($1.19B). GCAAF has higher P/E ratio than HALFF: GCAAF (10.76) vs HALFF (7.44). GCAAF YTD gains are higher at: 70.570 vs. HALFF (39.272). HALFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.95B vs. GCAAF (200M). HALFF has more cash in the bank: 4.32B vs. GCAAF (170M). GCAAF has less debt than HALFF: GCAAF (179M) vs HALFF (5.01B). HALFF has higher revenues than GCAAF: HALFF (12.5B) vs GCAAF (398M).
GCAAFHALFFGCAAF / HALFF
Capitalization1.19B15B8%
EBITDA200M2.95B7%
Gain YTD70.57039.272180%
P/E Ratio10.767.44145%
Revenue398M12.5B3%
Total Cash170M4.32B4%
Total Debt179M5.01B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCAAF vs HALFF: Fundamental Ratings
GCAAF
HALFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8740
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2365
SMR RATING
1..100
6393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8986
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCAAF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as HALFF (24). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HALFF (65). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as HALFF (93). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as HALFF (43). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

HALFF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (89). This means that HALFF’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCAAFHALFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HALFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTCL54.521.64
+3.10%
T-Rex 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
FTBD49.960.29
+0.58%
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF
VLUE120.420.43
+0.36%
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
GCC20.62-0.06
-0.29%
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Stgy Fd
USSG59.07-0.46
-0.78%
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Eq ETF

GCAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCAAF and AGFMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCAAF and AGFMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCAAF
1D Price
Change %
GCAAF100%
+0.04%
AGFMF - GCAAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
MAIN - GCAAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
HTGC - GCAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
GBLBY - GCAAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GCAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
More

HALFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HALFF and IVSBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HALFF and IVSBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HALFF
1D Price
Change %
HALFF100%
+1.15%
IVSBF - HALFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
CG - HALFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
TROW - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.01%
BUR - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
SEIC - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
More