GCAAF
Price
$30.10
Change
+$0.62 (+2.10%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
905.93M
HTGC
Price
$17.40
Change
+$0.07 (+0.40%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.88B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCAAF vs HTGC

Header iconGCAAF vs HTGC Comparison
Open Charts GCAAF vs HTGCBanner chart's image
Guardian Capital Group
Price$30.10
Change+$0.62 (+2.10%)
Volume$200
Capitalization905.93M
Hercules Capital
Price$17.40
Change+$0.07 (+0.40%)
Volume$988K
Capitalization2.88B
GCAAF vs HTGC Comparison Chart
Loading...
HTGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCAAF vs. HTGC commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCAAF is a Hold and HTGC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (GCAAF: $30.10 vs. HTGC: $17.40)
Brand notoriety: GCAAF and HTGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCAAF: 40% vs. HTGC: 73%
Market capitalization -- GCAAF: $905.93M vs. HTGC: $2.88B
GCAAF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $905.93M. HTGC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCAAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHTGC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • GCAAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HTGC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the long-term than GCAAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTGC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HTGC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

GCAAF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.10% price change this week, while HTGC (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.81% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HTGC($2.88B) has a higher market cap than GCAAF($906M). GCAAF has higher P/E ratio than HTGC: GCAAF (12.09) vs HTGC (7.88). GCAAF YTD gains are higher at: 6.473 vs. HTGC (-9.030). GCAAF has less debt than HTGC: GCAAF (159M) vs HTGC (1.56B). HTGC has higher revenues than GCAAF: HTGC (426M) vs GCAAF (255M).
GCAAFHTGCGCAAF / HTGC
Capitalization906M2.88B31%
EBITDA141MN/A-
Gain YTD6.473-9.030-72%
P/E Ratio12.097.88153%
Revenue255M426M60%
Total Cash139MN/A-
Total Debt159M1.56B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCAAF vs HTGC: Fundamental Ratings
GCAAF
HTGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1174
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3614
SMR RATING
1..100
7610
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2415
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HTGC's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (22). This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (36). This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCAAF (76). This means that HTGC’s stock grew significantly faster than GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as HTGC (59). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to HTGC’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (24). This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRWRX24.000.10
+0.42%
Transamerica International Equity R
GEMMX25.290.03
+0.12%
GMO Emerging Markets VI
GGZPX22.03N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P
LSAGX21.61-0.18
-0.83%
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A
GTILX26.92-0.36
-1.32%
Glenmede Disciplined USGrEqPtf InstlShrs

GCAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCAAF and AGFMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCAAF and AGFMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCAAF
1D Price
Change %
GCAAF100%
+2.10%
AGFMF - GCAAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAIN - GCAAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
HTGC - GCAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
GBLBY - GCAAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GCAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HTGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTGC has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTGC jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTGC
1D Price
Change %
HTGC100%
+0.40%
MAIN - HTGC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
FSK - HTGC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
ARCC - HTGC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
GLAD - HTGC
72%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
CSWC - HTGC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
More