Ad is loading...
GCBLX vs RLBFX
GCBLX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts GCBLX vs RLBFX
Green Century Balanced
Price$32.56
Change+$0.32 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.98M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.33
Change+$0.35 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.6B
GCBLX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCBLX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCBLX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. GCBLX (352M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than GCBLX: RLBFX (2.26) vs GCBLX (0.48). GCBLX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: GCBLX (33 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). GCBLX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. GCBLX (13.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCBLX: RLBFX (250) vs GCBLX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.94 vs. GCBLX (-4.93). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.28 vs. GCBLX (18.63).
| GCBLX | RLBFX | GCBLX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.30 | 487% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.30 | 487% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.676 | -3.733 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 352M | 225B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 2.26 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.93 | 1.94 | -254% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.29 | 12.83 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.63 | 34.28 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.72 | 45.85 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...