Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCCAX vs RSLBX
GCCAX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GCCAX vs RSLBX
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.19
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.78B
GCCAX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCCAX vs. RSLBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCCAX is a StrongBuy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 79.8B vs. GCCAX (449M). GCCAX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: GCCAX (0.65) vs RSLBX (0.06). GCCAX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GCCAX (6 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GCCAX (0.83). GCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). GCCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLBX: GCCAX (0) vs RSLBX (250). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.04 vs. GCCAX (-2.26). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 13.50 vs. GCCAX (-3.33).
| GCCAX | RSLBX | GCCAX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.75 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.75 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.046 | 9.112 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 449M | 79.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.06 | 1,128% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.26 | 9.04 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.64 | 29.89 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.33 | 13.50 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.49 | - |