GCEI
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
35.27M
SECYF
Price
$12.06
Change
+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCEI vs SECYF

Header iconGCEI vs SECYF Comparison
Open Charts GCEI vs SECYFBanner chart's image
Global Clean Energy
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.08M
Capitalization35.27M
SECURE WASTE INFRASTRUCTURE
Price$12.06
Change+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Volume$7.13K
Capitalization2.6B
GCEI vs SECYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GCEI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCEI vs. SECYF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCEI is a StrongBuy and SECYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GCEI: $0.06 vs. SECYF: $12.06)
Brand notoriety: GCEI and SECYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCEI: 125% vs. SECYF: 30%
Market capitalization -- GCEI: $35.27M vs. SECYF: $2.6B
GCEI [@Environmental Services] is valued at $35.27M. SECYF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $2.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $90.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCEI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSECYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GCEI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SECYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the long-term than GCEI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCEI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECYF’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCEI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SECYF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the short-term than GCEI.

Price Growth

GCEI (@Environmental Services) experienced а +7.69% price change this week, while SECYF (@Environmental Services) price change was +1.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.62% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SECYF($2.6B) has a higher market cap than GCEI($35.3M). SECYF YTD gains are higher at: 6.868 vs. GCEI (-28.205).
GCEISECYFGCEI / SECYF
Capitalization35.3M2.6B1%
EBITDAN/A428M-
Gain YTD-28.2056.868-411%
P/E RatioN/A18.15-
RevenueN/A10.3B-
Total CashN/A31M-
Total DebtN/A1.01B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCEI vs SECYF: Fundamental Ratings
GCEI
SECYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
125
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
10042
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1006
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCEI's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as SECYF (50). This means that GCEI’s stock grew similarly to SECYF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCEI (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than GCEI’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCEI (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCEI’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCEI (87). This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCEI’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCEI (100). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than GCEI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCEISECYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCEI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDMRX130.280.13
+0.10%
Janus Henderson Enterprise R
GSSIX43.46N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Inst
TWDAX19.00N/A
N/A
Templeton World Adv
MEFIX14.64N/A
N/A
Martin Currie Emerging Markets FI
AVEAX17.43N/A
N/A
Ave Maria Growth Focused

GCEI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCEI and SCPJ have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCEI and SCPJ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCEI
1D Price
Change %
GCEI100%
N/A
SCPJ - GCEI
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EAATF - GCEI
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSKIF - GCEI
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECYF - GCEI
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
SNRG - GCEI
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
More

SECYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SECYF and NVRI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECYF and NVRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SECYF
1D Price
Change %
SECYF100%
+0.67%
NVRI - SECYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
CLH - SECYF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
TMRAF - SECYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSKIF - SECYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCEI - SECYF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More