Ad is loading...
GCHDX vs NLSAX
GCHDX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts GCHDX vs NLSAX
Gotham Hedged Core Institutional
Price$10.94
Change-$0.21 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.01M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.14
Change-$0.19 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.18B
GCHDX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCHDX vs. NLSAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCHDX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.18B vs. GCHDX (5.01M). GCHDX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: GCHDX (0.66) vs NLSAX (0.00). GCHDX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: GCHDX (9 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). GCHDX (1.70) and NLSAX (1.68) have similar cost to investors . GCHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 211.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCHDX: NLSAX (1000) vs GCHDX (25000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.50 vs. GCHDX (-8.45). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.72 vs. GCHDX (14.96).
| GCHDX | NLSAX | GCHDX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.68 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.68 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.327 | -0.704 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.01M | 7.18B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.45 | 4.50 | -188% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.88 | 8.60 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.96 | 30.72 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...