Ad is loading...
GCHDX vs NLSAX
GCHDX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts GCHDX vs NLSAX
Gotham Hedged Core Institutional
Price$11.58
Change-$0.12 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.42
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.29B
GCHDX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCHDX vs. NLSAX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCHDX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.29B vs. GCHDX (5.38M). GCHDX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: GCHDX (0.65) vs NLSAX (0.00). GCHDX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: GCHDX (8 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). GCHDX (1.70) and NLSAX (1.68) have similar cost to investors . GCHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 211.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCHDX: NLSAX (1000) vs GCHDX (25000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. GCHDX (-2.34). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.27 vs. GCHDX (22.69).
| GCHDX | NLSAX | GCHDX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.68 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.68 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.540 | 0.758 | 467% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.38M | 7.29B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.34 | 6.23 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.96 | 11.71 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.69 | 32.27 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...