Ad is loading...
GCHDX vs NLSAX
GCHDX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts GCHDX vs NLSAX
Gotham Hedged Core Institutional
Price$11.89
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.42M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
GCHDX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCHDX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCHDX is a Buy and NLSAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.4B vs. GCHDX (5.42M). GCHDX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: GCHDX (0.89) vs NLSAX (0.30). GCHDX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: GCHDX (8 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). GCHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 195.00 vs. NLSAX (54.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCHDX: NLSAX (1000) vs GCHDX (25000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.64 vs. GCHDX (1.61). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.61 vs. GCHDX (12.87).
| GCHDX | NLSAX | GCHDX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.071 | 2.871 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.42M | 7.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.61 | 8.64 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.57 | 9.99 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.87 | 28.61 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers