Ad is loading...
GCHDX vs NLSAX
GCHDX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts GCHDX vs NLSAX
Gotham Hedged Core Institutional
Price$11.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.15M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.85
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
GCHDX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCHDX vs. NLSAX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCHDX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. GCHDX (5.15M). GCHDX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: GCHDX (0.66) vs NLSAX (0.00). GCHDX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: GCHDX (9 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). GCHDX (1.70) and NLSAX (1.68) have similar cost to investors . GCHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 211.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCHDX: NLSAX (1000) vs GCHDX (25000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. GCHDX (-4.59). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.24 vs. GCHDX (17.47).
| GCHDX | NLSAX | GCHDX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.68 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.68 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.920 | 2.004 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.15M | 7.33B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.59 | 6.63 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.41 | 15.43 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.47 | 30.24 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...