Ad is loading...
GCHDX vs NLSCX
GCHDX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts GCHDX vs NLSCX
Gotham Hedged Core Institutional
Price$11.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.15M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
GCHDX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCHDX vs. NLSCX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCHDX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. GCHDX (5.15M). GCHDX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: GCHDX (0.66) vs NLSCX (0.00). GCHDX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: GCHDX (9 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than GCHDX (1.70). GCHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 211.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCHDX: NLSCX (1000) vs GCHDX (25000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.82 vs. GCHDX (-4.59). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.09 vs. GCHDX (17.47).
| GCHDX | NLSCX | GCHDX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 2.43 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 2.43 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.920 | 1.696 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.15M | 7.33B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.59 | 5.82 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.41 | 12.65 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.47 | 25.09 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...