Ad is loading...
GCHDX vs NLSIX
GCHDX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts GCHDX vs NLSIX
Gotham Hedged Core Institutional
Price$11.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.15M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.16
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
GCHDX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCHDX vs. NLSIX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCHDX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. GCHDX (5.15M). GCHDX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: GCHDX (0.66) vs NLSIX (0.02). GCHDX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: GCHDX (9 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). GCHDX (1.70) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). GCHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 211.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). GCHDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: GCHDX (25000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.01 vs. GCHDX (-4.59). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. GCHDX (17.47).
| GCHDX | NLSIX | GCHDX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.32 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.32 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.920 | 2.080 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.15M | 7.33B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.02 | 3,065% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.59 | 7.01 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.41 | 16.73 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.47 | 32.72 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...