Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIAX vs VFWPX
GCIAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIAX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts A
Price$17.25
Change+$0.09 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.74B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$144.97
Change+$0.55 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
GCIAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIAX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. GCIAX (3.74B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIAX: VFWPX (2.79) vs GCIAX (1.75). GCIAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIAX (28 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIAX (1000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.82 vs. VFWPX (16.51). GCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.18 vs. VFWPX (39.87).
| GCIAX | VFWPX | GCIAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.03 | 3,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.03 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.394 | 20.947 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.74B | 68.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 2.79 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.82 | 16.51 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.83 | 35.57 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.18 | 39.87 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.69 | 57.78 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement