Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIAX vs VFWPX
GCIAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIAX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts A
Price$17.77
Change-$0.05 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.50
Change-$0.42 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
GCIAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIAX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GCIAX (4.68B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIAX: VFWPX (2.70) vs GCIAX (1.58). GCIAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIAX (28 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIAX (1000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.52 vs. VFWPX (21.62). GCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.43 vs. VFWPX (33.14).
| GCIAX | VFWPX | GCIAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.03 | 3,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.03 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.294 | 24.879 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 75.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 2.70 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.52 | 21.62 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.50 | 45.59 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.43 | 33.14 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.08 | 69.04 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement