Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIAX vs VFWPX
GCIAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIAX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts A
Price$16.82
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.62B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.93
Change-$0.24 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
GCIAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIAX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. GCIAX (3.62B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIAX: VFWPX (2.76) vs GCIAX (1.71). GCIAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIAX (28 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIAX (1000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX (17.82) and GCIAX (17.79) have marching annual gain over last year. GCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.45 vs. VFWPX (42.45).
| GCIAX | VFWPX | GCIAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.03 | 3,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.03 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.870 | 19.900 | 125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.62B | 68B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 2.76 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.79 | 17.82 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.49 | 40.91 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.45 | 42.45 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.57 | 53.89 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement