Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIIX vs VFWPX
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIIX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Instl
Price$17.89
Change-$0.27 (-1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.29B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$145.17
Change-$1.37 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIIX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. GCIIX (4.29B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIIX: VFWPX (2.79) vs GCIIX (1.99). GCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIIX (28 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIIX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.81 vs. VFWPX (14.91). GCIIX return over 5 years is better than : 63.17 vs. VFWPX (39.29).
| GCIIX | VFWPX | GCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.366 | 22.723 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.29B | 68.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 2.79 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.81 | 14.91 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.23 | 43.41 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.17 | 39.29 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.46 | 67.29 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement