Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIIX vs VFWPX
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIIX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Instl
Price$17.02
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.32B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$139.63
Change+$0.39 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIIX is a Buy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. GCIIX (3.32B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIIX: VFWPX (2.76) vs GCIIX (1.95). GCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIIX (28 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIIX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.03 vs. VFWPX (10.44). GCIIX return over 5 years is better than : 59.93 vs. VFWPX (38.63).
| GCIIX | VFWPX | GCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.895 | 16.609 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 68B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 2.76 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.03 | 10.44 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.22 | 40.59 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.93 | 38.63 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.80 | 45.84 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement