Ad is loading...
GCIIX vs VFWPX
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIIX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Instl
Price$15.09
Change+$0.14 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$124.02
Change+$0.69 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.54B
GCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIIX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.5B vs. GCIIX (2.09B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIIX: VFWPX (3.04) vs GCIIX (2.20). GCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIIX (28 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). GCIIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIIX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. VFWPX (4.64). GCIIX return over 5 years is better than : 68.07 vs. VFWPX (45.66).
| GCIIX | VFWPX | GCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.322 | 3.110 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 59.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 3.04 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.21 | 4.64 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.71 | 7.32 | 310% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.07 | 45.66 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.98 | 25.64 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers