Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCIUX vs VFWPX
GCIUX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GCIUX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts R6
Price$17.87
Change+$0.10 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.76B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$144.97
Change+$0.55 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
GCIUX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCIUX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCIUX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. GCIUX (3.76B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GCIUX: VFWPX (2.79) vs GCIUX (2.00). GCIUX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GCIUX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GCIUX (0.86) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GCIUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 167.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GCIUX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GCIUX (5000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). GCIUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.00 vs. VFWPX (16.96). GCIUX return over 5 years is better than : 64.02 vs. VFWPX (40.41).
| GCIUX | VFWPX | GCIUX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 2,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.03 | 2,867% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.376 | 21.408 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 100000000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.76B | 68.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 2.79 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.00 | 16.96 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.64 | 36.09 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.02 | 40.41 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.18 | 58.38 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement