Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLLX vs RWEBX
GCLLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLLX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity C
Price$16.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.84M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.54
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
GCLLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLLX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. GCLLX (379M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GCLLX: RWEBX (0.76) vs GCLLX (0.00). GCLLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GCLLX (18 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GCLLX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). GCLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCLLX: RWEBX (250) vs GCLLX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.20 vs. GCLLX (1.03). RWEBX (39.61) and GCLLX (39.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GCLLX | RWEBX | GCLLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.06 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.017 | 7.797 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.03 | 3.20 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.50 | 26.70 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.07 | 39.61 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.22 | 66.23 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers