Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLLX vs RWMFX
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCLLX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity C
Price$16.32
Change+$0.17 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.19M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.97
Change+$0.35 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.6B
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLLX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLLX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 195B vs. GCLLX (436M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCLLX: RWMFX (1.47) vs GCLLX (0.00). GCLLX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCLLX (17 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCLLX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCLLX: RWMFX (250) vs GCLLX (1000). GCLLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. RWMFX (6.12). GCLLX (52.36) and RWMFX (49.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GCLLX | RWMFX | GCLLX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.31 | 542% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.31 | 645% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.554 | 6.014 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 195B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 6.12 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | 18.81 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.36 | 49.94 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.21 | 69.11 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers