Ad is loading...
GCLLX vs RWMFX
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCLLX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enh Core EqFund-ClassC
Price$16.38
Change-$0.30 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets423.83M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.14
Change-$0.88 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.11B
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLLX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLLX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. GCLLX (424M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCLLX: RWMFX (1.70) vs GCLLX (0.00). GCLLX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCLLX (17 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RWMFX (30.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCLLX: RWMFX (250) vs GCLLX (1000). GCLLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.28 vs. RWMFX (8.20). GCLLX return over 5 years is better than : 50.14 vs. RWMFX (38.24).
| GCLLX | RWMFX | GCLLX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.862 | 4.242 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 424M | 196B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.28 | 8.20 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.46 | 18.09 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.14 | 38.24 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.97 | 61.66 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...