Ad is loading...
GCLLX vs RWMFX
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCLLX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enh Core EqFund-ClassC
Price$14.87
Change+$1.25 (+9.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.88M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$59.75
Change+$4.29 (+7.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.96B
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLLX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLLX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 181B vs. GCLLX (352M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCLLX: RWMFX (1.53) vs GCLLX (0.00). GCLLX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCLLX (17 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCLLX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCLLX: RWMFX (250) vs GCLLX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.19 vs. GCLLX (-8.84). GCLLX return over 5 years is better than : 48.20 vs. RWMFX (44.88).
| GCLLX | RWMFX | GCLLX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.31 | 542% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.31 | 645% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.133 | -9.504 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 352M | 181B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.84 | -8.19 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.42 | -2.62 | -207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.20 | 44.88 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.96 | 42.44 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...