Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLLX vs RWMFX
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCLLX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity C
Price$16.69
Change+$0.09 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets447.2M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$63.45
Change+$0.27 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.99B
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLLX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLLX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 198B vs. GCLLX (447M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCLLX: RWMFX (1.47) vs GCLLX (0.00). GCLLX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCLLX (17 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCLLX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCLLX: RWMFX (250) vs GCLLX (1000). GCLLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.79 vs. RWMFX (6.85). GCLLX return over 5 years is better than : 65.50 vs. RWMFX (59.15).
| GCLLX | RWMFX | GCLLX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.31 | 542% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.31 | 645% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.217 | 3.921 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 198B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.79 | 6.85 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.09 | 30.03 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.50 | 59.15 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.15 | 68.71 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement