Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLLX vs RWMFX
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCLLX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity C
Price$16.95
Change+$0.09 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets456.11M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.64
Change+$0.19 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.46B
GCLLX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLLX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLLX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. GCLLX (456M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCLLX: RWMFX (1.48) vs GCLLX (0.00). GCLLX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCLLX (17 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCLLX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCLLX: RWMFX (250) vs GCLLX (1000). GCLLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. RWMFX (5.95). GCLLX return over 5 years is better than : 56.84 vs. RWMFX (52.59).
| GCLLX | RWMFX | GCLLX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.31 | 542% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.31 | 645% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.818 | 5.870 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 201B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 5.95 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.17 | 33.84 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.84 | 52.59 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.23 | 67.29 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement