Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCOW vs VWID
GCOW vs VWID Comparison
Open Charts GCOW vs VWID
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
Price$37.90
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
Volume$390.51K
Net Assets2.3B
Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF
Price$31.76
Change+$0.22 (+0.70%)
Volume$1.66K
Net Assets12.62M
GCOW vs VWID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCOW vs. VWID commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCOW is a Hold and VWID is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCOW has more net assets: 2.3B vs. VWID (12.6M). VWID has a higher annual dividend yield than GCOW: VWID (22.351) vs GCOW (13.492). GCOW was incepted earlier than VWID: GCOW (9 years) vs VWID (8 years). VWID (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than GCOW (0.60). GCOW has a higher turnover VWID (41.00) vs VWID (41.00).
| GCOW | VWID | GCOW / VWID | |
| Gain YTD | 13.492 | 22.351 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 12.6M | 18,222% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.49 | 122% |
| Turnover | 65.00 | 41.00 | 159% |
| Yield | 3.86 | 3.63 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GCOW | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GCOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCOW has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GCOW jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCOW | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| SHEL - GCOW | 69% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| BHP - GCOW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| KMI - GCOW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| BN - GCOW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| TS - GCOW | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||
VWID and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VWID has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VWID jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VWID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VWID | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| NWG - VWID | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| OTEX - VWID | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| BP - VWID | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| LAND - VWID | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| WPP - VWID | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||