Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCOW vs WDIV
GCOW vs WDIV Comparison
Open Charts GCOW vs WDIV
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
Price$39.60
Change-$0.33 (-0.83%)
Volume$125.76K
Net Assets2.46B
SPDR® S&P Global Dividend ETF
Price$73.70
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
Volume$9.39K
Net Assets225.45M
GCOW vs WDIV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCOW vs. WDIV commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCOW is a Hold and WDIV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCOW has more net assets: 2.46B vs. WDIV (225M). WDIV has a higher annual dividend yield than GCOW: WDIV (21.669) vs GCOW (19.431). GCOW was incepted earlier than WDIV: GCOW (10 years) vs WDIV (12 years). WDIV (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than GCOW (0.60). WDIV has a higher turnover GCOW (49.00) vs GCOW (49.00).
| GCOW | WDIV | GCOW / WDIV | |
| Gain YTD | 19.431 | 21.669 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 2.46B | 225M | 1,094% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.40 | 150% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 56.00 | 88% |
| Yield | 2.64 | 4.09 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GCOW | WDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GCOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCOW has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GCOW jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCOW | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| SHEL - GCOW | 68% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| BHP - GCOW | 67% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| TTE - GCOW | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| KMI - GCOW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| BN - GCOW | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
WDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDIV has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WDIV jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDIV | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| BN - WDIV | 74% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| RY - WDIV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| SAN - WDIV | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| HBAN - WDIV | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| FNB - WDIV | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||