Ad is loading...
GCPAX vs JHQCX
GCPAX vs JHQCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCPAX vs. JHQCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCPAX is a Buy and JHQCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHQCX has more cash in the bank: 19.9B vs. GCPAX (242M). GCPAX pays higher dividends than JHQCX: GCPAX (0.47) vs JHQCX (0.09). GCPAX was incepted earlier than JHQCX: GCPAX (11 years) vs JHQCX (11 years). JHQCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than GCPAX (1.09). JHQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GCPAX (32.00). JHQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCPAX: JHQCX (1000) vs GCPAX (2500). GCPAX (5.11) and JHQCX (4.91) have marching annual gain over last year. GCPAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.27 vs. JHQCX (46.28).
| GCPAX | JHQCX | GCPAX / JHQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.33 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.33 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.506 | -7.575 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 242M | 19.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.09 | 510% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.11 | 4.91 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.52 | 22.76 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.27 | 46.28 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.98 | 86.97 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...