Ad is loading...
GCSAX vs NAESX
GCSAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GCSAX vs NAESX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts A
Price$23.71
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets407.93M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.00
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
GCSAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCSAX vs. NAESX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCSAX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. GCSAX (408M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GCSAX: NAESX (1.43) vs GCSAX (0.93). GCSAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GCSAX (28 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GCSAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). GCSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GCSAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. GCSAX (-10.41). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 67.63 vs. GCSAX (17.42).
| GCSAX | NAESX | GCSAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.702 | -6.997 | 124% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 408M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.43 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.41 | 0.34 | -3,021% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.40 | 22.70 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.42 | 67.63 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.17 | 91.04 | 25% |