Ad is loading...
GCTRX vs RWEBX
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$42.43
Change-$2.33 (-5.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.63B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$59.23
Change-$2.27 (-3.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.67B
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 188B vs. GCTRX (3.64B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWEBX (0.83) vs GCTRX (0.45). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GCTRX (0.70). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWEBX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.22 vs. RWEBX (1.38). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 135.73 vs. RWEBX (75.23).
| GCTRX | RWEBX | GCTRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.06 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.06 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.786 | 0.766 | -625% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.64B | 188B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.83 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.22 | 1.38 | 450% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.52 | 6.61 | 371% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.73 | 75.23 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers