Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWEBX
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$49.60
Change+$0.44 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.11B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.15
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.05B
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. GCTRX (4.11B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWEBX (0.80) vs GCTRX (0.41). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GCTRX (0.68). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWEBX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.94 vs. RWEBX (7.02). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 99.83 vs. RWEBX (52.48).
| GCTRX | RWEBX | GCTRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.509 | 5.319 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.11B | 202B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.80 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.94 | 7.02 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.73 | 29.59 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.83 | 52.48 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers