Ad is loading...
GCTRX vs RWEBX
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$43.39
Change+$0.28 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.94B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$59.86
Change+$0.15 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets182.14B
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. GCTRX (2.94B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWEBX (0.83) vs GCTRX (0.45). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GCTRX (0.70). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWEBX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.18 vs. RWEBX (0.97). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 96.59 vs. RWEBX (51.93).
| GCTRX | RWEBX | GCTRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.06 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.06 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.700 | -1.921 | 401% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.94B | 182B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.83 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | 0.97 | 636% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.35 | 10.01 | 313% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.59 | 51.93 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...