Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWEBX
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$47.47
Change+$0.46 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.84B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.49
Change+$0.34 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.6B
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 195B vs. GCTRX (3.84B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWEBX (0.80) vs GCTRX (0.43). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GCTRX (0.68). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWEBX (31.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWEBX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. RWEBX (5.28). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 88.36 vs. RWEBX (46.08).
| GCTRX | RWEBX | GCTRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 5.665 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.84B | 195B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.80 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | 5.28 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.72 | 16.71 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.36 | 46.08 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers