Ad is loading...
GCTRX vs RWEBX
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$47.30
Change+$0.69 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.46B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$63.60
Change+$0.83 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.1B
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Mar 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 193B vs. GCTRX (3.46B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWEBX (1.07) vs GCTRX (0.48). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.00 vs. RWEBX (30.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWEBX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. RWEBX (5.66). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 101.28 vs. RWEBX (50.21).
| GCTRX | RWEBX | GCTRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.851 | 2.632 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46B | 193B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.07 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.82 | 5.66 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.58 | 14.13 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.28 | 50.21 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.54 | - |