Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWEBX
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$52.55
Change+$0.30 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.33B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.52
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.31B
GCTRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. GCTRX (4.33B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWEBX (0.78) vs GCTRX (0.39). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GCTRX (0.68). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWEBX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. RWEBX (7.37). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 99.05 vs. RWEBX (50.95).
| GCTRX | RWEBX | GCTRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.147 | 9.145 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.33B | 207B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.78 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.28 | 7.37 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.28 | 33.56 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.05 | 50.95 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement