Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWMFX
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$47.47
Change+$0.46 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.84B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.97
Change+$0.35 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.6B
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 195B vs. GCTRX (3.84B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWMFX (1.47) vs GCTRX (0.43). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCTRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWMFX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. RWMFX (6.12). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 88.36 vs. RWMFX (49.94).
| GCTRX | RWMFX | GCTRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 6.014 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.84B | 195B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.47 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | 6.12 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.72 | 18.81 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.36 | 49.94 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement