Ad is loading...
GCTRX vs RWMFX
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$42.43
Change-$2.33 (-5.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.63B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$59.59
Change-$2.28 (-3.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.67B
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 188B vs. GCTRX (3.64B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWMFX (1.53) vs GCTRX (0.45). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCTRX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWMFX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.22 vs. RWMFX (2.19). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 135.73 vs. RWMFX (79.80).
| GCTRX | RWMFX | GCTRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.786 | 0.955 | -501% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.64B | 188B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.53 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.22 | 2.19 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.52 | 8.51 | 288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.73 | 79.80 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...