Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCTRX vs RWMFX
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$52.55
Change+$0.30 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.33B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.05
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.31B
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. GCTRX (4.33B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWMFX (1.43) vs GCTRX (0.39). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCTRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWMFX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. RWMFX (8.25). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 99.05 vs. RWMFX (55.22).
| GCTRX | RWMFX | GCTRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.147 | 9.752 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.33B | 207B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.43 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.28 | 8.25 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.28 | 36.23 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.05 | 55.22 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement