Ad is loading...
GCTRX vs RWMFX
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GCTRX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
Price$44.90
Change+$0.72 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$61.92
Change+$0.91 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.37B
GCTRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCTRX vs. RWMFX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 184B vs. GCTRX (2.99B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GCTRX: RWMFX (1.54) vs GCTRX (0.46). GCTRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GCTRX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GCTRX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GCTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCTRX: RWMFX (250) vs GCTRX (5000000). GCTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.98 vs. RWMFX (5.51). GCTRX return over 5 years is better than : 100.71 vs. RWMFX (60.60).
| GCTRX | RWMFX | GCTRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.020 | 1.037 | -581% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 184B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.54 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.98 | 5.51 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 15.01 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.71 | 60.60 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...