GCTS vs PATH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCTS is a Hold and PATH is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GCTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePATH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GCTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GCTS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PATH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GCTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PATH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GCTS (@Semiconductors) experienced а -5.58% price change this week, while PATH (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.96%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
PATH is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (-3.71% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
@Packaged Software (+0.15% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| GCTS | PATH | GCTS / PATH | |
| Capitalization | 125M | 12.9B | 1% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -142.12M | - |
| Gain YTD | -75.947 | -45.531 | 167% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 1.31B | - |
| Total Cash | 4.04M | 1.88B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 44.4M | 67.1M | 66% |
| GCTS | PATH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 15% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 46% | 8 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 67% | 15 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
GCTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GCTS and PATH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCTS and PATH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCTS | 100% | -8.96% | ||
| PATH - GCTS | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| LAW - GCTS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| ZM - GCTS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
| OKTA - GCTS | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| RVYL - GCTS | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.65% | ||
More | ||||
PATH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATH has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PATH jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PATH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATH | 100% | +1.27% | ||
| CRM - PATH | 69% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| COIN - PATH | 67% Closely correlated | -10.78% | ||
| NTNX - PATH | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| RIOT - PATH | 60% Loosely correlated | -12.39% | ||
| CLSK - PATH | 60% Loosely correlated | -15.03% | ||
More | ||||