Ad is loading...
GCVAX vs RMFCX
GCVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$21.64
Change+$0.28 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.97M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.18B
GCVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.2B vs. GCVAX (508M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMFCX (1.34) vs GCVAX (0.86). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCVAX (26 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GCVAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMFCX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. GCVAX (-9.67). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. GCVAX (28.13).
| GCVAX | RMFCX | GCVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.91 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.466 | -2.681 | 241% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 508M | 97.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.34 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.67 | 1.87 | -516% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.73 | 6.27 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.13 | 53.32 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.84 | 54.78 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...