Ad is loading...
GCVAX vs RMFCX
GCVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$22.88
Change+$0.17 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets512.62M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
GCVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GCVAX (513M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMFCX (1.37) vs GCVAX (0.89). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCVAX (26 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GCVAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMFCX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. GCVAX (-5.56). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. GCVAX (32.00).
| GCVAX | RMFCX | GCVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.91 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.841 | 1.270 | -145% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.37 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.56 | 5.35 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.84 | 17.29 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.00 | 56.16 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.65 | 60.33 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...