Ad is loading...
GCVUX vs RMFCX
GCVUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
Price$22.18
Change+$0.25 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets514.33M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.74
Change+$0.73 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
GCVUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. GCVUX (514M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCVUX: RMFCX (1.34) vs GCVUX (1.22). GCVUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCVUX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GCVUX (0.65). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RMFCX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. GCVUX (-7.54). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.30 vs. GCVUX (33.53).
| GCVUX | RMFCX | GCVUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.91 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.887 | -1.247 | 392% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 514M | 97.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.34 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.54 | 3.87 | -195% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.63 | 9.64 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.53 | 54.30 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers