Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVUX vs RMFCX
GCVUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
Price$25.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets551.5M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
GCVUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GCVUX (551M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCVUX: RMFCX (1.24) vs GCVUX (1.17). GCVUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCVUX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GCVUX (0.65). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RMFCX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. GCVUX (-2.38). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. GCVUX (33.88).
| GCVUX | RMFCX | GCVUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.91 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.073 | 11.421 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 551M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.24 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.38 | 7.71 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.22 | 32.16 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.88 | 56.41 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.00 | 91.12 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement