Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVUX vs RWMHX
GCVUX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RWMHX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
Price$25.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.53M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$65.89
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
GCVUX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. GCVUX (570M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than GCVUX: RWMHX (1.33) vs GCVUX (1.10). GCVUX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: GCVUX (10 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). GCVUX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RWMHX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.91 vs. GCVUX (-6.28). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 43.18 vs. GCVUX (26.04).
| GCVUX | RWMHX | GCVUX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.41 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.41 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.837 | 8.429 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.33 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.28 | 3.91 | -161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.97 | 29.08 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.04 | 43.18 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.15 | 71.17 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers