GDLNF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
46.95M
GLBXF
Price
$0.89
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
34.29M
Ad is loading...

GDLNF vs GLBXF

Header iconGDLNF vs GLBXF Comparison
Open Charts GDLNF vs GLBXFBanner chart's image
ENERGY TRANSITION MINERALS
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$621.53K
Capitalization46.95M
Globex Mining Enterprises
Price$0.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.31K
Capitalization34.29M
GDLNF vs GLBXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GDLNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDLNF vs. GLBXF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDLNF is a Hold and GLBXF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GDLNF: $0.05 vs. GLBXF: $0.89)
Brand notoriety: GDLNF and GLBXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDLNF: 151% vs. GLBXF: 39%
Market capitalization -- GDLNF: $46.95M vs. GLBXF: $34.29M
GDLNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $46.95M. GLBXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $34.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDLNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLBXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GDLNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLBXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLBXF is a better buy in the long-term than GDLNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDLNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLBXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDLNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLBXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLBXF is a better buy in the short-term than GDLNF.

Price Growth

GDLNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +8.46% price change this week, while GLBXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDLNF($47M) has a higher market cap than GLBXF($34.3M). GDLNF YTD gains are higher at: 163.158 vs. GLBXF (8.121). GLBXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.43M vs. GDLNF (-94.14M). GDLNF has more cash in the bank: 30.3M vs. GLBXF (21.7M). GLBXF has less debt than GDLNF: GLBXF (53.2K) vs GDLNF (751K). GLBXF has higher revenues than GDLNF: GLBXF (1.58M) vs GDLNF (41K).
GDLNFGLBXFGDLNF / GLBXF
Capitalization47M34.3M137%
EBITDA-94.14M-2.43M3,867%
Gain YTD163.1588.1212,009%
P/E RatioN/A2.90-
Revenue41K1.58M3%
Total Cash30.3M21.7M140%
Total Debt751K53.2K1,412%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDLNF vs GLBXF: Fundamental Ratings
GDLNF
GLBXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10042
SMR RATING
1..100
9856
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GDLNF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBXF (67). This means that GDLNF’s stock grew similarly to GLBXF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDLNF (100). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDLNF (98). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

GDLNF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBXF (40). This means that GDLNF’s stock grew similarly to GLBXF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as GDLNF (100). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew similarly to GDLNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDLNFGLBXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GDLNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAPR45.050.29
+0.65%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Apr
FRDM33.840.18
+0.53%
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
BUL48.480.21
+0.43%
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
SCHP25.950.02
+0.08%
Schwab US TIPS ETF™
RODE27.49N/A
N/A
Hartford Multifactor Divers Intl ETF

GDLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDLNF and BRYGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDLNF and BRYGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDLNF
1D Price
Change %
GDLNF100%
-13.79%
BRYGF - GDLNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBBMF - GDLNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
METOF - GDLNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
GOMRF - GDLNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
GLBXF - GDLNF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

GLBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBXF and SGML have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBXF and SGML's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBXF
1D Price
Change %
GLBXF100%
-0.09%
SGML - GLBXF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
FQVLF - GLBXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
TGB - GLBXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVPAF - GLBXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
GLNCY - GLBXF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
More