Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
92 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GDMA vs NOC
GDMA vs NOC Comparison
Open Charts GDMA vs NOC
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Price$39.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$121
Net Assets226.48M
Northrop Grumman
Price$596.43
Change-$2.92 (-0.49%)
Volume$5.69K
Capitalization85.58B
GDMA vs NOC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GDMA vs. NOC commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDMA is a Hold and NOC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOC: Fundamental Ratings
NOC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GDMA | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 15 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 56% | 6 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GDMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMA | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | -9.03% | ||
| LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | -3.24% | ||
| AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
| NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| DLTR - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||
NOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been loosely correlated with RTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then RTX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y