GDQMF
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.03 (-6.12%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
158.35M
GLCNF
Price
$3.96
Change
-$0.06 (-1.50%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
47.18B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDQMF vs GLCNF

Header iconGDQMF vs GLCNF Comparison
Open Charts GDQMF vs GLCNFBanner chart's image
Goldquest Mining
Price$0.46
Change-$0.03 (-6.12%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization158.35M
Glencore
Price$3.96
Change-$0.06 (-1.50%)
Volume$90.67K
Capitalization47.18B
GDQMF vs GLCNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GDQMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDQMF vs. GLCNF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDQMF is a Hold and GLCNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (GDQMF: $0.46 vs. GLCNF: $3.95)
Brand notoriety: GDQMF and GLCNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDQMF: 3% vs. GLCNF: 416%
Market capitalization -- GDQMF: $158.35M vs. GLCNF: $47.18B
GDQMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $158.35M. GLCNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $47.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDQMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLCNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GDQMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLCNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GDQMF is a better buy in the long-term than GLCNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDQMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLCNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDQMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLCNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLCNF is a better buy in the short-term than GDQMF.

Price Growth

GDQMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.78% price change this week, while GLCNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +118.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLCNF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.15% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLCNF($47.2B) has a higher market cap than GDQMF($158M). GDQMF YTD gains are higher at: 141.868 vs. GLCNF (-7.800). GLCNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.13B vs. GDQMF (-3.96M). GLCNF has more cash in the bank: 1.42B vs. GDQMF (14.2M). GLCNF has higher revenues than GDQMF: GLCNF (231B) vs GDQMF (0).
GDQMFGLCNFGDQMF / GLCNF
Capitalization158M47.2B0%
EBITDA-3.96M8.13B-0%
Gain YTD141.868-7.800-1,819%
P/E RatioN/A14.75-
Revenue0231B-
Total Cash14.2M1.42B1%
Total DebtN/A38.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDQMF vs GLCNF: Fundamental Ratings
GDQMF
GLCNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6460
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10062
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4126

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GDQMF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLCNF (93). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

GLCNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as GDQMF (64). This means that GLCNF’s stock grew similarly to GDQMF’s over the last 12 months.

GDQMF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as GLCNF (100). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew similarly to GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

GDQMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GLCNF (60). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew similarly to GLCNF’s over the last 12 months.

GLCNF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDQMF (100). This means that GLCNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDQMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDQMFGLCNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDQMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DH4.030.02
+0.50%
Definitive Healthcare Corp
BOTJ15.54-0.01
-0.06%
Bank of the James Financial Group
KLIC37.50-0.30
-0.79%
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
HII270.79-3.13
-1.14%
Huntington Ingalls Industries
UK1.02-0.02
-2.35%
Ucommune International Ltd

GDQMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDQMF and SILEF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDQMF and SILEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDQMF
1D Price
Change %
GDQMF100%
-5.49%
SILEF - GDQMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
TECK - GDQMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
SOUHY - GDQMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
GLBXF - GDQMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
GLCNF - GDQMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
More

GLCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLCNF has been closely correlated with BDNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLCNF jumps, then BDNNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLCNF
1D Price
Change %
GLCNF100%
-1.49%
BDNNY - GLCNF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
RIO - GLCNF
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
BHP - GLCNF
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
TECK - GLCNF
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
IVPAF - GLCNF
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.99%
More