GDQMF
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.03 (-6.12%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
158.35M
SOUHY
Price
$8.83
Change
-$0.02 (-0.23%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
7.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDQMF vs SOUHY

Header iconGDQMF vs SOUHY Comparison
Open Charts GDQMF vs SOUHYBanner chart's image
Goldquest Mining
Price$0.46
Change-$0.03 (-6.12%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization158.35M
South32
Price$8.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
Volume$161.16K
Capitalization7.98B
GDQMF vs SOUHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GDQMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOUHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDQMF vs. SOUHY commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDQMF is a Hold and SOUHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (GDQMF: $0.46 vs. SOUHY: $8.83)
Brand notoriety: GDQMF and SOUHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDQMF: 3% vs. SOUHY: 202%
Market capitalization -- GDQMF: $158.35M vs. SOUHY: $7.98B
GDQMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $158.35M. SOUHY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDQMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOUHY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GDQMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SOUHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GDQMF is a better buy in the long-term than SOUHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDQMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOUHY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDQMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SOUHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GDQMF is a better buy in the short-term than SOUHY.

Price Growth

GDQMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.78% price change this week, while SOUHY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +118.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.15% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOUHY($7.98B) has a higher market cap than GDQMF($158M). GDQMF YTD gains are higher at: 141.868 vs. SOUHY (-14.574). SOUHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 689M vs. GDQMF (-3.96M). SOUHY has more cash in the bank: 1.61B vs. GDQMF (14.2M). SOUHY has higher revenues than GDQMF: SOUHY (6.1B) vs GDQMF (0).
GDQMFSOUHYGDQMF / SOUHY
Capitalization158M7.98B2%
EBITDA-3.96M689M-1%
Gain YTD141.868-14.574-973%
P/E RatioN/A25.23-
Revenue06.1B-
Total Cash14.2M1.61B1%
Total DebtN/A1.65B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDQMF vs SOUHY: Fundamental Ratings
GDQMF
SOUHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6479
SMR RATING
1..100
9688
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3881
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GDQMF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOUHY (94). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOUHY’s over the last 12 months.

GDQMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as SOUHY (79). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew similarly to SOUHY’s over the last 12 months.

SOUHY's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as GDQMF (96). This means that SOUHY’s stock grew similarly to GDQMF’s over the last 12 months.

GDQMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOUHY (81). This means that GDQMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOUHY’s over the last 12 months.

SOUHY's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDQMF (100). This means that SOUHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDQMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDQMFSOUHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDQMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOUHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVOL35.020.04
+0.13%
FirstTrustDorseyWrightMomt&LwVolatil ETF
PQJL27.580.01
+0.05%
PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JULY
SMCF33.91N/A
N/A
Themes US Small Cp CA Flw Champ ETF
HYBB47.13-0.04
-0.08%
iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF
EQTY25.87-0.17
-0.65%
Kovitz Core Equity ETF

GDQMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDQMF and SILEF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDQMF and SILEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDQMF
1D Price
Change %
GDQMF100%
-5.49%
SILEF - GDQMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
TECK - GDQMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
SOUHY - GDQMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
GLBXF - GDQMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
GLCNF - GDQMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
More

SOUHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOUHY has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOUHY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOUHY
1D Price
Change %
SOUHY100%
-0.23%
BHP - SOUHY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
GLNCY - SOUHY
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
RIO - SOUHY
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
GLCNF - SOUHY
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
VALE - SOUHY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More