GDXJ
Price
$115.89
Change
-$3.60 (-3.01%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Net Assets
8.69B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLVP
Price
$37.62
Change
+$1.13 (+3.10%)
Updated
Aug 14, 11:39 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
974.16M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDXJ vs SLVP

GDXJ vs SLVP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) vs. iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP)

Key Takeaways

  • GDXJ provides targeted exposure to small-capitalization junior gold and silver mining companies, while SLVP focuses on a broader basket of global silver and metals miners with a market-capitalization-weighted approach.
  • GDXJ typically holds a larger number of securities (approximately 80-100) compared to SLVP's more concentrated portfolio of around 35 holdings, resulting in different diversification profiles within the precious metals sector.
  • Expense ratios differ meaningfully: SLVP at 0.39% offers a lower cost structure than GDXJ at approximately 0.52%, influencing long-term net returns for buy-and-hold investors.
  • Both ETFs track passive, rules-based indexes in the metals and mining sector, with GDXJ emphasizing junior miners (higher volatility potential) and SLVP including established silver producers across developed and emerging markets.
  • Structural positioning favors SLVP for broader silver-specific exposure and cost efficiency, whereas GDXJ suits investors seeking leveraged upside to smaller gold mining firms during commodity upcycles.
  • Relative risk profiles reflect index construction: GDXJ's junior focus introduces greater company-specific and liquidity risks, while SLVP's global metals mandate provides modest sector diversification within silver mining.

Introduction

Investors seeking precious metals exposure often compare specialized mining ETFs to align portfolios with commodity cycles, inflation hedges, and sector rotations. The VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and the iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) do not compete directly as identical strategies but serve as complementary alternatives within the metals mining theme. GDXJ targets junior gold miners, while SLVP emphasizes silver and related metals producers. This comparison highlights structural distinctions that matter for risk tolerance, cost considerations, and thematic conviction in the current environment of fluctuating metal prices and macroeconomic uncertainty.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) Overview

The VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. This rules-based index tracks small-capitalization companies primarily engaged in gold and silver mining. The fund typically maintains 80-100 holdings, with top positions concentrated among junior producers such as smaller exploration and development firms. Sector allocation is overwhelmingly metals and mining, with negligible exposure outside precious metals. The expense ratio stands at approximately 0.52%. As a passive, market-capitalization-weighted ETF, it rebalances periodically according to index rules. Distinguishing features include its focus on higher-risk, higher-reward junior miners, which amplifies sensitivity to gold price movements and operational developments at smaller companies.

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) Overview

The iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, providing exposure to global companies primarily involved in silver mining. The ETF holds approximately 35 securities, with top holdings including established producers such as Hecla Mining (HL), Industrias Peñoles, and First Majestic Silver. Allocation remains concentrated in metals and mining, with nearly all assets in silver and related metals companies. The expense ratio is 0.39%. Structured as a passive, market-capitalization-weighted product, it applies index-driven rebalancing. Key characteristics include broader inclusion of mid- and large-cap silver miners across regions and a focus on companies deriving the majority of revenue from silver production.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector operates within a macro environment shaped by interest rate expectations, inflation trends, geopolitical tensions, and industrial demand for silver in solar and electronics applications. Capital flows into gold and silver miners often accelerate during periods of monetary easing or heightened uncertainty, while regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards can influence project timelines. Both ETFs benefit from broader commodity momentum but face risks from rising operational costs, supply disruptions, and shifts in investor sentiment toward risk assets. Recent market cycles have underscored the sector's cyclical nature, with junior miners exhibiting amplified moves relative to established producers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance dynamics have reflected differing sensitivities to metal prices and company sizes. GDXJ's junior miner emphasis has historically delivered stronger upside during gold rallies but with elevated volatility tied to individual company execution risks. SLVP's silver-focused holdings have shown more moderate swings, supported by diversified global exposure and larger average market capitalizations. Relative positioning favors SLVP in environments emphasizing cost efficiency and steadier sector participation, while GDXJ aligns with tactical allocations seeking outsized gains from smaller firms. Both ETFs respond to commodity trends, though GDXJ's structure introduces greater dispersion from broader market moves during earnings cycles of top holdings.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to the iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) in the current environment. Lower expense ratio, more concentrated yet established holdings, and focused silver exposure contribute to favorable cost efficiency and trend consistency relative to the higher-volatility profile of the VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Diversification across global silver miners and reduced company-specific risk in the index construction support this positioning, though outcomes remain dependent on commodity price paths and sector momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDXJ vs. SLVP commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXJ is a StrongBuy and SLVP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXJ has more net assets: 8.69B vs. SLVP (974M). SLVP has a higher annual dividend yield than GDXJ: SLVP (6.933) vs GDXJ (1.854). GDXJ was incepted earlier than SLVP: GDXJ (17 years) vs SLVP (15 years). SLVP (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than GDXJ (0.52). SLVP has a higher turnover GDXJ (36.00) vs GDXJ (36.00).
GDXJSLVPGDXJ / SLVP
Gain YTD1.8546.93327%
Net Assets8.69B974M892%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.39133%
Turnover36.0074.0049%
Yield2.762.37117%
Fund Existence17 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXJSLVP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLVP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EKJAX9.82N/A
N/A
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
VSIIX60.06N/A
N/A
Vanguard Morn Small Cap Value Idx Instl
IYEFX12.65N/A
N/A
Nomura Climate Solutions R
AWIIX15.33N/A
N/A
CIBC Atlas Income Opportunities Instl
FVDMX46.14N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value Discovery C

GDXJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDXJ
1D Price
Change %
GDXJ100%
-3.01%
KGC - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
PAAS - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
-9.70%
AEM - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
CGAU - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
AGI - GDXJ
89%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
More