GECC
Price
$10.87
Change
+$0.04 (+0.37%)
Updated
May 9, 01:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
100.86M
83 days until earnings call
MRCC
Price
$6.61
Change
-$0.31 (-4.48%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
156M
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GECC vs MRCC

Header iconGECC vs MRCC Comparison
Open Charts GECC vs MRCCBanner chart's image
Great Elm Capital
Price$10.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.37%)
Volume$301
Capitalization100.86M
Monroe Capital
Price$6.61
Change-$0.31 (-4.48%)
Volume$145.38K
Capitalization156M
GECC vs MRCC Comparison Chart
Loading...
GECC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GECC vs. MRCC commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GECC is a Buy and MRCC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (GECC: $10.83 vs. MRCC: $6.61)
Brand notoriety: GECC and MRCC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GECC: 35% vs. MRCC: 180%
Market capitalization -- GECC: $100.86M vs. MRCC: $156M
GECC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $100.86M. MRCC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $156M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GECC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMRCC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GECC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MRCC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GECC is a better buy in the long-term than MRCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GECC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRCC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GECC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MRCC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GECC is a better buy in the short-term than MRCC.

Price Growth

GECC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +8.73% price change this week, while MRCC (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

GECC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

MRCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRCC($156M) has a higher market cap than GECC($101M). MRCC has higher P/E ratio than GECC: MRCC (365.00) vs GECC (3.20). GECC YTD gains are higher at: 2.014 vs. MRCC (-19.746). GECC has more cash in the bank: 33.4M vs. MRCC (5.32M). GECC has less debt than MRCC: GECC (140M) vs MRCC (301M). GECC has higher revenues than MRCC: GECC (30.2M) vs MRCC (5.47M).
GECCMRCCGECC / MRCC
Capitalization101M156M65%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.014-19.746-10%
P/E Ratio3.20365.001%
Revenue30.2M5.47M553%
Total Cash33.4M5.32M627%
Total Debt140M301M47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GECC vs MRCC: Fundamental Ratings
GECC
MRCC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3052
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7737
SMR RATING
1..100
4726
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRCC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GECC (4). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to GECC’s over the last 12 months.

MRCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GECC (77). This means that MRCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GECC’s over the last 12 months.

MRCC's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as GECC (47). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to GECC’s over the last 12 months.

GECC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (58). This means that GECC’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

GECC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRCC (100). This means that GECC’s stock grew significantly faster than MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GECCMRCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GECC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNMA6.710.28
+4.35%
Fannie Mae
VWAPY11.080.27
+2.50%
Volkswagen AG
ANYYY25.85-0.72
-2.70%
Aena SME S.A.
XISHY6.40-0.20
-3.03%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Limited
RDGL0.13N/A
-3.59%
Vivos Inc.

GECC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GECC and NMFC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GECC and NMFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GECC
1D Price
Change %
GECC100%
+0.05%
NMFC - GECC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
BCSF - GECC
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.12%
MRCC - GECC
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.48%
MFIC - GECC
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
TCPC - GECC
29%
Poorly correlated
+7.41%
More

MRCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCC has been loosely correlated with FDUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCC jumps, then FDUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCC
1D Price
Change %
MRCC100%
-4.48%
FDUS - MRCC
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
NMFC - MRCC
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
ARCC - MRCC
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
BCSF - MRCC
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.12%
SAR - MRCC
51%
Loosely correlated
-7.94%
More