Advertisement
GECSF vs GLVT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GECSF is a Hold and GLVT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GECSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLVT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GECSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GLVT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GECSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLVT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GECSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GLVT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
GECSF (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -7.48% price change this week, while GLVT (@Data Processing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -4.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.26%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -5.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.07%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-4.85% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
@Data Processing Services (-5.75% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| GECSF | GLVT | GECSF / GLVT | |
| Capitalization | 16.9M | 7.76M | 218% |
| EBITDA | -19.76M | -32.22K | 61,327% |
| Gain YTD | 67.095 | 10.465 | 641% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.73 | 1.44 | 745% |
| Revenue | 70.3M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 1.09M | 0 | - |
| Total Debt | 231M | 185K | 124,865% |
GECSF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GECSF | GLVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 50% |
Advertisement
GECSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GECSF and BMBLF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GECSF and BMBLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GECSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GECSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BMBLF - GECSF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
| CBZ - GECSF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| SCGPY - GECSF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VCIG - GECSF | 12% Poorly correlated | +19.61% | ||
| AERT - GECSF | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.73% | ||
More | ||||
GLVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLVT and CRWE have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLVT and CRWE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLVT | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRWE - GLVT | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AERT - GLVT | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.73% | ||
| GLAI - GLVT | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GECSF - GLVT | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PMEC - GLVT | -4% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||