GECSF
Price
$0.19
Change
+$0.01 (+5.56%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
20.12M
SCGPY
Price
$2.68
Change
+$0.30 (+12.61%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GECSF vs SCGPY

Header iconGECSF vs SCGPY Comparison
Open Charts GECSF vs SCGPYBanner chart's image
Global Education Communities
Price$0.19
Change+$0.01 (+5.56%)
Volume$900
Capitalization20.12M
Serco Group
Price$2.68
Change+$0.30 (+12.61%)
Volume$402
Capitalization2.2B
GECSF vs SCGPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GECSF vs. SCGPY commentary
Jun 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GECSF is a Hold and SCGPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 10, 2025
Stock price -- (GECSF: $0.19 vs. SCGPY: $2.68)
Brand notoriety: GECSF and SCGPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GECSF: 20% vs. SCGPY: 46%
Market capitalization -- GECSF: $20.12M vs. SCGPY: $2.2B
GECSF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $20.12M. SCGPY’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GECSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGPY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GECSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCGPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCGPY is a better buy in the long-term than GECSF.

Price Growth

GECSF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCGPY (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +12.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCGPY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+2.12% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCGPY($2.2B) has a higher market cap than GECSF($20.1M). SCGPY YTD gains are higher at: 55.842 vs. GECSF (37.838). SCGPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 392M vs. GECSF (-45.18M). SCGPY has higher revenues than GECSF: SCGPY (4.53B) vs GECSF (75.9M).
GECSFSCGPYGECSF / SCGPY
Capitalization20.1M2.2B1%
EBITDA-45.18M392M-12%
Gain YTD37.83855.84268%
P/E RatioN/A11.74-
Revenue75.9M4.53B2%
Total Cash7.57MN/A-
Total Debt282MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GECSF vs SCGPY: Fundamental Ratings
GECSF
SCGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10022
SMR RATING
1..100
9192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
982
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a4

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCGPY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as GECSF (58). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to GECSF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GECSF (100). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew significantly faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.

GECSF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGPY (92). This means that GECSF’s stock grew similarly to SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GECSF (40). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to GECSF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GECSF (98). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew significantly faster than GECSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FKU46.380.15
+0.32%
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX® ETF
DBAW36.930.06
+0.17%
Xtrackers MSCI All World exUS Hdg Eq ETF
INTF34.200.05
+0.15%
iShares International Equity Factor ETF
HYGI26.980.01
+0.04%
iShares Inflation Hedged Hgh Yld Bd ETF
UTES72.55-0.32
-0.44%
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF

GECSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GECSF and BMBLF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GECSF and BMBLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GECSF
1D Price
Change %
GECSF100%
+7.42%
BMBLF - GECSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBZ - GECSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
SCGPY - GECSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VCIG - GECSF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
AERT - GECSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGPY has been loosely correlated with SECUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGPY jumps, then SECUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGPY
1D Price
Change %
SCGPY100%
N/A
SECUF - SCGPY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
BMBLF - SCGPY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
CASS - SCGPY
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
GHC - SCGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
BRC - SCGPY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More