Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMCX vs RNWBX
GEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GEMCX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$24.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.02B
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.30
Change+$0.31 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.33B
GEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GEMCX (3.02B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than GEMCX: RNWBX (0.12) vs GEMCX (0.00). GEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GEMCX (28 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GEMCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX (37.00) and GEMCX (36.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs GEMCX (1000). GEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.33 vs. RNWBX (12.70). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.53 vs. GEMCX (18.75).
| GEMCX | RNWBX | GEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.67 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.67 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.602 | 24.133 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.02B | 75.3B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.33 | 12.70 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.91 | 50.67 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.75 | 29.53 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.32 | 90.44 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers