Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMCX vs RNWBX
GEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GEMCX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$23.96
Change-$0.26 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
GEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. GEMCX (2.94B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than GEMCX: RNWBX (0.12) vs GEMCX (0.00). GEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GEMCX (28 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GEMCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX (37.00) and GEMCX (36.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs GEMCX (1000). GEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. RNWBX (18.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. GEMCX (5.78).
| GEMCX | RNWBX | GEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.67 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.67 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.810 | 23.046 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.94B | 74.9B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 18.50 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.53 | 43.20 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.78 | 16.42 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.42 | 82.43 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement