Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMRX vs RNWBX
GEMRX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GEMRX vs RNWBX
abrdn Emerging Markets R
Price$16.95
Change-$0.09 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets967.87M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
GEMRX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMRX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMRX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. GEMRX (968M). GEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GEMRX (0.40) vs RNWBX (0.12). GEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GEMRX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GEMRX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GEMRX (33.00). GEMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: GEMRX (0) vs RNWBX (250). GEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.19 vs. RNWBX (11.48). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.41 vs. GEMRX (5.21).
| GEMRX | RNWBX | GEMRX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.67 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.67 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.091 | 23.671 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 968M | 75.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.12 | 332% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.19 | 11.48 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.12 | 54.43 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.21 | 25.41 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.35 | 86.19 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement