Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMUX vs RNWBX
GEMUX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GEMUX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq R6
Price$26.43
Change+$0.22 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.82B
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.22
Change+$0.87 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
GEMUX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMUX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMUX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. GEMUX (2.82B). GEMUX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GEMUX (1.02) vs RNWBX (0.13). GEMUX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GEMUX (10 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GEMUX (1.12). RNWBX (37.00) and GEMUX (36.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMUX: RNWBX (250) vs GEMUX (5000000). GEMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.05 vs. RNWBX (10.04). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.16 vs. GEMUX (23.07).
| GEMUX | RNWBX | GEMUX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.67 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.67 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.780 | 14.507 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 69B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.13 | 755% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.05 | 10.04 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.77 | 32.68 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.07 | 30.16 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers