Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMUX vs RNWBX
GEMUX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GEMUX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq R6
Price$27.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.89B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.70
Change+$0.31 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
GEMUX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMUX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMUX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. GEMUX (2.89B). GEMUX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GEMUX (0.95) vs RNWBX (0.13). GEMUX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GEMUX (10 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GEMUX (1.12). RNWBX (37.00) and GEMUX (36.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMUX: RNWBX (250) vs GEMUX (5000000). GEMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. RNWBX (11.99). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 18.24 vs. GEMUX (11.81).
| GEMUX | RNWBX | GEMUX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.67 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.67 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.417 | 17.879 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 71.8B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.13 | 736% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.48 | 11.99 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.74 | 36.12 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.81 | 18.24 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.60 | 81.10 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement