Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEMUX vs RNWBX
GEMUX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GEMUX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq R6
Price$26.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.85B
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.93
Change-$0.11 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.3B
GEMUX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMUX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMUX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.3B vs. GEMUX (2.85B). GEMUX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GEMUX (0.96) vs RNWBX (0.13). GEMUX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GEMUX (10 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GEMUX (1.12). RNWBX (37.00) and GEMUX (36.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMUX: RNWBX (250) vs GEMUX (5000000). GEMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.44 vs. RNWBX (10.23). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.46 vs. GEMUX (17.26).
| GEMUX | RNWBX | GEMUX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.67 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.67 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.974 | 15.622 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 70.3B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.13 | 749% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.44 | 10.23 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.65 | 38.39 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.26 | 24.46 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement