Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GERCX vs RNWBX
GERCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GERCX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts C
Price$10.21
Change+$0.13 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.45B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.82
Change+$1.12 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
GERCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GERCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GERCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. GERCX (2.45B). GERCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GERCX (0.18) vs RNWBX (0.13). GERCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GERCX (18 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GERCX (2.26) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). GERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 168.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GERCX: RNWBX (250) vs GERCX (1000). GERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.34 vs. RNWBX (12.55). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.52 vs. GERCX (8.64).
| GERCX | RNWBX | GERCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.67 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.67 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.721 | 18.042 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.45B | 71.8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.13 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.34 | 12.55 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.96 | 34.74 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.64 | 22.52 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.07 | 86.65 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement