Advertisement
GEV vs SAMT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEV is a Buy and SAMT is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GEV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GEV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
| GEV | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
SAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMT has been closely correlated with GEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAMT jumps, then GEV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMT | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| GEV - SAMT | 74% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| PWR - SAMT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| GS - SAMT | 68% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| TLN - SAMT | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.63% | ||
| CEG - SAMT | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||