Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HGOCX
GFACX vs HGOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HGOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.60
Change+$0.22 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$63.68
Change+$0.43 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.58B
GFACX vs HGOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HGOCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HGOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. HGOCX (6.58B). GFACX (0.00) and HGOCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HGOCX: GFACX (24 years) vs HGOCX (23 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: GFACX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.33 vs. GFACX (16.21). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 33.28 vs. HGOCX (-38.72).
| GFACX | HGOCX | GFACX / HGOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.86 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.296 | 7.823 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 6.58B | 4,937% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.21 | 29.33 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 89.30 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.28 | -38.72 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.02 | -47.35 | -142% |