Ad is loading...
GFACX vs HSUTX
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Rational Dynamic Brands Instl
Price$67.14
Change-$1.25 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.24M
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUTX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and HSUTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. HSUTX (78.2M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUTX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUTX: GFACX (24 years) vs HSUTX (22 years). HSUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 194.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUTX: GFACX (250) vs HSUTX (1000). HSUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.34 vs. GFACX (10.15). HSUTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.88 vs. GFACX (32.83).
| GFACX | HSUTX | GFACX / HSUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 2.379 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 78.2M | 388,747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 17.34 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 34.04 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 46.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | -66.93 | -83% |