Ad is loading...
GFACX vs HSUTX
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.92
Change+$1.26 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.66B
Rational Dynamic Brands Instl
Price$60.23
Change+$0.84 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.29M
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUTX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and HSUTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. HSUTX (67.3M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUTX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUTX: GFACX (24 years) vs HSUTX (23 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than HSUTX (1.26). HSUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 194.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUTX: GFACX (250) vs HSUTX (1000). HSUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.47 vs. GFACX (-5.27). HSUTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. GFACX (28.45).
| GFACX | HSUTX | GFACX / HSUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.26 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.136 | -9.439 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262B | 67.3M | 389,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.27 | 7.47 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.96 | 27.36 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.45 | 42.32 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.91 | -71.28 | -43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers