Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUTX
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.89
Change+$0.12 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Rational Dynamic Brands Instl
Price$68.48
Change+$0.12 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.68M
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUTX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HSUTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. HSUTX (70.7M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUTX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUTX: GFACX (24 years) vs HSUTX (23 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than HSUTX (1.19). HSUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUTX: GFACX (250) vs HSUTX (1000). HSUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. GFACX (11.95). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.88 vs. HSUTX (19.72).
| GFACX | HSUTX | GFACX / HSUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.19 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.19 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.319 | 4.239 | 338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 70.7M | 463,932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.95 | 15.30 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.01 | 62.53 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.88 | 19.72 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.96 | -63.56 | -121% |