Ad is loading...
GFACX vs HSUTX
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Rational Dynamic Brands Instl
Price$59.17
Change-$2.62 (-4.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.71M
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUTX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HSUTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. HSUTX (70.7M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUTX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUTX: GFACX (24 years) vs HSUTX (23 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than HSUTX (1.26). HSUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 194.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUTX: GFACX (250) vs HSUTX (1000). HSUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. GFACX (-1.75). HSUTX return over 5 years is better than : 70.63 vs. GFACX (59.73).
| GFACX | HSUTX | GFACX / HSUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.26 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -6.801 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 70.7M | 396,040% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | 6.70 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | 18.47 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 70.63 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | -69.59 | -64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...