Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HSUTX
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HSUTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.62
Change+$0.69 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Rational Dynamic Brands Instl
Price$67.97
Change+$0.81 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.32M
GFACX vs HSUTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HSUTX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and HSUTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. HSUTX (75.3M). GFACX (0.00) and HSUTX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HSUTX: GFACX (24 years) vs HSUTX (23 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than HSUTX (1.19). HSUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUTX: GFACX (250) vs HSUTX (1000). HSUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.81 vs. GFACX (8.68). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.40 vs. HSUTX (35.94).
| GFACX | HSUTX | GFACX / HSUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.19 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.19 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.759 | 3.644 | 295% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 75.3M | 428,951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 14.81 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.72 | 75.81 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.40 | 35.94 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.66 | -66.15 | -102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement